Congruence Through Rigid Motions
Go from precise geometric definitions to proving triangles congruent with rigid motions, using only free resources.
A performance task in which the learner decides whether pairs of figures are congruent and proves it with rigid motions.
You will be given two pairs of figures by the assessor and will add three pairs of your own. For every pair, decide whether the figures are congruent. Justify each decision: with a sequence of rigid motions if they are congruent, and with an argument that no rigid motion can exist if they are not. Finish with a proof for one pair of triangles that their corresponding sides and angles are congruent.
| Level | Description |
|---|---|
| Proficient | Every decision is correct. Every congruent pair has a correct, complete sequence of rigid motions. The triangle proof is valid and uses the definition of congruence in terms of rigid motions. |
| Developing | Decisions are correct but at least one justification is incomplete or relies on appearance rather than a rigid motion. |
| Beginning | At least one decision is incorrect, or justifications do not use rigid motions. |
Only Proficient work counts as evidence for the Congruence and Rigid Motions credential.
Past New York State Geometry Regents examinations, published with answer keys and rating guides at nysedregents.org, contain questions aligned to the same standards and can be used for additional practice or as supplementary evidence.
Go from precise geometric definitions to proving triangles congruent with rigid motions, using only free resources.
The holder can define the objects of plane geometry, represent and perform rigid motions, and prove figures congruent using rigid motions.